Monday, March 4, 2013

The role of "storefront clergy"

             I was really fascinated by Venkatesh’s analysis of “big preachers” versus “storefront clergy”. Today in my History of the Civil Rights Movement class we discussed the idea of “big preachers” in relation to the civil rights movement and James Baldwin’s piece, The Fire Next Time. James Baldwin, an author and civil rights activist, was turned from his devout Christianity because of this same narrative of “big preachers” who saw the church as a means of income and used it to advance their personal and financial needs above those of the greater community. Baldwin renounces these “big preachers” for obscuring the Christian doctrine for political advancement, but what he does not addressed is what Venkatesh would refer to as “storefront clergy”.

While big preachers are preoccupied with political priorities, storefront clergy have much smaller and much poorer congregations and they devote much of their lives to actively addressing the pressing issues of their community. Venkatesh refers to the storefront preachers as mediators who take preventative measures against violence and crime. Additionally, these preachers work with all members of the community, including gang members, to resolve issues between individuals and groups. In this way, it seems to me as if clergy would have an incredibly influential role in mediating conflicts in their immediate communities. Very similar to the basis for the CeaseFire Initiative we discussed previously, preachers have an interesting opportunity for conflict alleviation because they have a first-hand understanding of the problems and are presumably fairly well respected in the community.  They also have a moral responsibility to fulfill the will of God which binds them to these problems.

Though it would be hard to measure, I wonder how significant a role the church plays in alleviating urban social problems across impoverished communities in the US. Venkatesh asserts that in the “storefront clergy” act as social workers and mediators in Maquis Park though I wonder how impactful the church can be in communities for easing problems such as gangs, violence, unemployment, homelessness etc. as an alternative to the justice system or police involvement.  

2 comments:

  1. I was thinking of things along the same lines. I feel like the "storefront clergy" and the "big preachers" each play a unique role in the community. In reading Chapter 5, The Preacher, I quickly noticed many parallels to Orsi’s Gods of the City. However, beyond the first 10 pages or so, this parallel did not pan out as I anticipated. As such, I feel like Venkatesh missed a vital role of the clergy in inner cities as liaisons for Poverty Inc, especially for the suburbanite. Maybe this is because such interactions are recorded on the books, but I feel like there is a lot more backroom dealing for the right to provide services than accounted for. For example, the Religious Bosses, who pastor multimillion dollar congregations, acquire grant money (on top of their already flowing philanthropy budget), as Venkatesh mentions, to offer food assistance, social services, etc. to the poor. This process, in the theory of Orsi, stems from a moral depravity of middle class life. The suburbanites rush to the city on Sundays to donate to the church so they can fill that void of philanthropy not being experiences out on the metropolitan fringes. It seems like there would be a lot of negotiations off the books between politicians and clergy to acquire resources and also between the block club leaders and clergy to ensure the right neighbors receive the right services. Just a thought, what do you all think about Orsi’s view on religion to the role of Venkatesh’s pastor?

    ReplyDelete
  2. In Memphis, there is a really great example of how church’s can impact communities’ health care. For some individuals the healthcare system in Memphis is troubling for three specific reasons. Many individuals lack insurance or a way to pay for medical visits and prescriptions. Other individuals feel intimidated by the healthcare system and are weary of doctors and hospitals. Finally, some individuals are just unaware of the health issues in their community. A program called the Memphis Congregational Health Network (CHN) is working to fix these issues. CHN works with Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare hospitals along with many mid south congregations in order to build stronger relationships between local communities and their healthcare system. The church is involved in building this relationship so they can help their congregation stay healthy and aware of health issues in the community. When an individual enters Methodist there are Navigators and Liaisons that help connect the patient with their congregation. This alerts the church of the patient’s situation and allows them to help in any way possible (e.g. transportation from the hospital to their home, paying for prescriptions). Not only is CHN involved directly with patients, it also tries to prevent health issues through programs that promote community health. The collaboration between the church and Methodist has shown positive results in their patient care, patient satisfactory, and length of patient stay. Therefore this collaboration between church and community healthcare is beneficial because it improves the relationship between the community and healthcare.
    http://www.methodisthealth.org/about-us/faith-and-health/community/

    ReplyDelete