The data
of “No Real Release” and “Reentry” has caused me to wonder about some of our
contradictory views of criminals and prisoners in the United States. I think the
federal rhetoric of the last forty years has primed many Americans to support
increasingly merciless criminal punishment laws, but they simultaneously do not
seem to wish for most offenders to suffer painfully or indefinitely. The
existence of parole suggests that our government understands this and acknowledges
the basic reintegration needs of ex-prisoners, but its understanding is rigid
and unsympathetic to the real obstacles these people face when they are
released, as Western’s examination of technical parole violations and their
severe consequences indicates. While some regions, like New York City, have
developed some programs to address the need for help with social reintegration
that former prisoners generally require, most parts of the nation lack
equivalent programs. The onus for reintegration in these places is therefore
placed upon ex-prisoners themselves, even though during their imprisonments
many of them lose the familial and communal ties that could help them navigate
this process.
In much of the United States,
ex-felons are denied access to necessities like housing and sufficient
healthcare that are enjoyed by most other citizens. Why do we allow them full
access to these things in prison but prevent them from acquiring them after
they are released? Moreover, if we
consider it just to deny former criminals of these things after they have ‘paid’
for their crime, why do we try to help them at all with parole’s requirements
for drug abstinence and employment or local programs like New York’s Center for
Employment Opportunities?
To
me these views reflect a general American sentiment against the cruel treatment
of prisoners and ex-prisoners, but only in cases where that cruelty is
absolutely undeniable. More subtle cruelties seem to be readily justified by
our politicians and criminal justice workers and readily overlooked by others.
No comments:
Post a Comment